<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>** My Intellectual Flakes ** &#187; pedagogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liping.edublogs.org/category/pedagogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liping.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>On technology, education and media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pedagogy, content and technology</title>
		<link>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/11/05/pedagogy-content-and-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/11/05/pedagogy-content-and-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liping</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pedagogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/11/05/pedagogy-content-and-technology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reread the article concerning TPCK by Mishra &#38; Koehler (2006) today and found it shed some lights on the relationships among pedagogy, content and technology. They pointed out that traditional view held that content was the original driving force, pedagogy and technology have to follow the content to be delivered. As a matter of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reread the article concerning TPCK by Mishra &amp; Koehler (2006) today and found it shed some lights on the relationships among pedagogy, content and technology. They pointed out that traditional view held that content was the original driving force, pedagogy and technology have to follow the content to be delivered. As a matter of fact, the relationship is not so clear-cut and straightforward. The addition of new technology, sometimes can give a rise to the pedagogical reengineering of the course. Or technology itself, in some cases, is the new content for the curriculum. Thus, it seems that the relationship between these three parties &#8211; technology, pedagogy and content &#8211; is a <strong>dynamic equilibrium</strong>.</p>
<p>Mishra, P., &amp; Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Dr. Mishra came to HKU and had a seminar on TPCK, (now they call it T-PACK). He was a great speaker and the seminar was engaging. He also touched upon this issue of what drives what that brought echoes in me. His attitude towards this is that what really matter is not which drives which, but the WHY question. The big &#8220;WHY&#8221; question is really the key. As long as it is appropriately tackled, the matter of which one among TPC serve as the motivator becomes a not-so-significant issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/11/05/pedagogy-content-and-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relationship between pedagogy and technology</title>
		<link>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/relationship-between-pedagogy-and-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/relationship-between-pedagogy-and-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pedagogy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/relationship-between-pedagogy-and-technology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a little bit confused lately about which comes first, technology or pedagogy. On one hand, there are many criticism on technology determinism. The way of putting technology before pedagogy is was found problematic. On the other hand, many people advocate that using technology to support old pedagogy is like old wine in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a little bit confused lately about which comes first, technology or pedagogy. On one hand, there are many criticism on technology determinism. The way of putting technology before pedagogy is was found problematic. On the other hand, many people advocate that using technology to support old pedagogy is like old wine in the new bottle. What is needed is the pedagogical reenginnering using technology as a lever. Are these two viewpoints contradictory? So which one, technology or pedagogy, should come first? Which one should drive which one? Or is it the chicken-egg issue?</p>
<p>**********<br />
I popped this question at the seminar today since the presenter mentioned that technology should drive teachers to rethink their pedagogy. She kinda answered in an indirect way. She said that she won&#8217;t claim that technology drives pedagogy; but schools are driven by the socity as a whole. And since technology is an vital part of the society nowadays, it surely influence the way we teach.</p>
<p>She surely address the problem from a different angle. But it set me to ponder over the question again. I began to think probably the way I phrase the question was problematic. I sort of treat either technology and pedagogy as static object. As matter of the fact, it might be more appropriate to think them as dynamic force which can have influence over each other. So instead of asking which one drives which one, it might makes more sense to look into the interplay between these two forces. In another word, both technology and pedagogy are independent as well as dependent variables. </p>
<p>Although there is no definite answer at this point (there might never be..), the process of rephrasing and refining the question is also a step forward. <img src="http://www.xanga.com/images/pleased.gif" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liping.edublogs.org/2007/05/07/relationship-between-pedagogy-and-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
